I'm not sexist but...

User Submission

User Submission

Posted 3/28/12 @ 12:30 PM
#
5 notes
Source: notsexistbut
Posted 3/27/12 @ 4:20 PM
#
19 notes

Question from Anonymous

Trans people? Non-cis people? Trans experiences? Basically, the medicalised stuff makes a lot of people uncomfortable because it has the effect of excising trans people's personhood (said advisedly to encompass non-human trans people as well) from the discourse. Don't think of trans people as a subject - think of us as a population.

Okay, thank you :)

ETA: While looking at vocab I saw the word “Transfolk” or “trans folk”, is this appropriate?

Posted 3/27/12 @ 2:03 PM
#
1 note

Question from Anonymous

For one thing, please don't call it transsexualism, that's a very medicalised term. Don't forget non-binary and intersex people. Don't assume anything universal about the trans experience.

Thanks for the answer! I’m doing this for a class where the medical term would probably be preferred, but what other terms would you suggest?

Don’t worry, we won’t assume anything universal and we’ll make sure our presentation reflects that.

Posted 3/27/12 @ 1:54 PM
#
1 note

Asking all readers:

A group I’m in would like to do a presentation on transsexualism.

So far topics that we’re considering talking about are:

1. What are some common misconceptions about transsexualism?

2. Terms to be aware of when talking about the subject.

3. Possible procedures (chemical, psychological, and surgical) as well as the risks that go along with it.

4. Biological/psychological theories behind transsexualism (and if any are problematic we’re going to tackle why they’re problematic).

5. Social aspect & risks of being transsexual.

Does anyone have any suggestions of what else would fit into this topic? Any comments on the topics we’ve thought of so far?

Posted 3/27/12 @ 1:44 PM
#
19 notes